In his Foreword to the 1966 Second Edition of The Lord of the Rings, Tolkien was at pains to emphasise that the book was Not an allegory: in particular it was not an allegory of the 1939-45 World War:
The real war does not resemble the legendary war in its process or its conclusion. If it had inspired or directed the development of the legend, then certainly the Ring would have been seized and used against Sauron; he would not have been annihilated but enslaved, and Barad-dûr would not have been destroyed but occupied. Saruman, failing to get possession of the Ring, would in the confusion and treacheries of the time have found in Mordor the missing links in his own researches into Ring-lore, and before long he would have made a Great Ring of his own with which to challenge the self-styled Ruler of Middle-earth. In that conflict both sides would have held hobbits in hatred and contempt: they would not long have survived even as slaves.
We could, inverting Tolkien's point, play with the idea of what would have happened in WW II if it had followed the lines of LotR...
**
The One Ring = The Atom Bomb
Sauron = Hitler
Mordor = Germany under National Socialism
Saruman = Stalin
Isengard = Moscow
The Free Peoples = USA and UK
The plot would focus on the destruction of the Atom Bomb (and implicitly all knowledge required to make it) by a small team of English patriots led by George Orwell, who infiltrate Germany and destroy the evil research establishment which is making the A-bomb.
The team are 'helped' by a slimy little creature called Mussolini, who gets them into the lab but intends to seize the death weapon for himself.
The climactic end would be the death of Mussolini; killed when the ready-for-use bomb prototype explodes in his face as he tries to steal it. A chain reaction speads through Nazi HQ and Hitler and his Nazi-Nazguls are caught in the conflagration, ending the National Socialist regime.
Orwell and his 'batman' servant Monty are airlifted from the blazing ruins at the last moment.
Europe comes under the rule of the restored King Albrecht - the exiled Duke of Bavaria, and heir to the United States monarchy. He had been given the throne by popular acclaim during the course of the war, and is now ruling from his palace in Richmond, Virginia.
The Holy Roman Empire is thus restored.
En route there would be the destruction of the Soviet Union, the restoration of the Tsar, and the exile of Stalin.
After Moscow is obliterated by enraged Finns wearing Mech suits; Stalin makes his way to England, where he is welcomed by the quisling Communist Prime Minister, Konni Zilliacus. Stalin swiftly invites foreign mercenaries, takes over in a secret coup, enslaves the native English and manages to pollute or destroy much of the countryside before Orwell and his English patriots return and raise a successful counter-revolution.
After the scouring of England, the defeated Stalin is stabbed by his creepy deputy Lavrentiy Beria - who is immediately executed by a mob of pitchfork-wielding rustics (despite Orwell's protests...).
England repudiates industrialisation, is demilitarised, sealed against immigration, and made into a clan-based dominion ruled by benign hereditary aristocrats - under the personal protection of King Albrecht.
Orwell, traumatised and made consumptive by his wartime experiences, sails West toward the sunset in a small boat and eventually arrives in... Ireland; where he ends his days peacefully as a subsistence crofter.
(...No wonder Tolkien cordially disliked allegory, 'in all its manifestations'...)
4 comments:
I like it - a great video game idea, too! ('Call of Duty: Orwell Warfare'?) Was there in reality - and/or ought there to be in the story - any contact between the Zilliaci (if that is the correct plural) and A.E. Waite in Maida Vale in the 1940s?
David Llewellyn Dodds
P.S.: Does the restored Holy Lance stay in Vienna, or get to travel to Virginia? By the way, do you mean George Philipp Albrecht Carl Maria Joseph Ludwig Hubertus Stanislaus Leopold Herzog von Württemberg, or are you thinking of Rupprecht Maria Luitpold Ferdinand - and, what of Otto von Habsburg?
@David - Thanks!
Zilliacus was a real person, a fifth columnist MP in my part of the world:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konni_Zilliacus
He was on George Orwell's 'List' of crypto-Soviet sympathisers.
I meant Albrecht - I read something that said he had a claim to be heir of the Holy Roman Empire, and he lived at the right time.
Duke Albrecht von Wittelsbach could possibly claim the Holy Roman Empire via election, but it would be much more likely that what remained of the electors, and Albrecht himself would support Archduke Otto von Habsburg, the direct heir not only of Franz II the last reigning Holy Roman Emperor, but of Charlemagne, the first.
Very good, I laughed and thought "if only"...
I guess the Hapsburgs would be the Stewards of Gondor.
Post a Comment