*
Although The Inklings are usually considered to be a literary group, they were really much more like historians.
*
With the exception of Robert 'Humphrey' Havard (scientist and doctor) all of the main members took an historical perspective on their subject: Tolkien was a philologist, Jack Lewis wrote about medieval literature and society, Charles Williams published several historical 'potboilers' - and some, such as Warnie Lewis and Gervase Mathew - were straightforward historians, who wrote history books.
But the core Inklings had a specifically mythical interest in history.
*
This was partly intrinsic to the individuals (and a major reason for their friendship), but found an early formulation in the first books of Owen Barfield - Poetic Diction and History in English Words which had a major impact on both Lewis (who had been friends with Barfield since they were undergraduate contemporaries) and Tolkien.
*
The key activity shared by Lewis and Tolkien - and to very varying degrees by the other Inklings - was the recovery of the mythic vision of history.
That was what the Inklings meetings were about.
Yes they were a writing group, and a social group; but what was being written and what kept the group together around Lewis had this core, implicit, purpose and tendency.
*
More importantly, it is why the group is still of interest today.
Because the problem for which mythic history is proposed as (at least the start of) a solution is by now very bad indeed, and much worse than in the 1930s and 1940s.
*
The Inklings were not just historians, nor even historians of ideas: they were engaged in trying to reconnect the modern mind with an historical mode of thought, a mythic mode of thought - by argument, by scholarship, and of course by the imagination.
*
5 comments:
So now that you've whetted our appetites, can you please provide a reading list where we can marinate in this mythic mode of thought? Thank you.
The reading list of core relevance would simply be the main output of Tolkien and Lewis: their stories and essays.
"the recovery of the mythic vision of history."
I don't want to marinate: do you recommend any specific, short introductory works (blog posts?) that explain this idea?
@ajb -
http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.com/2011/01/curing-vulgarization-of-england-from.html
http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.com/2010/10/real-history-becoming-more-mythical.html
http://notionclubpapers.blogspot.com/2011/04/tolikiens-notion-club-papers-completed.html
Bruce, thanks for links to those. I don't 'get' it, though. Is what Tolkien is doing here similar to what Virgil was doing in The Aeneid?
Post a Comment